Ahmed Quraishi
After the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the American-British [Am-Brit] media highlighted how Indian police had arrested two Indian Muslims who had links to the Kashmiri group Lashkar Tayyiba. But the Am-Brit media goes silent when the truth comes out and it turns out that Indian military intelligence is involved in creating fake terrorists and blaming them on Pakistan.
NEW DELHI, India—The Indian police authorities and the officials of India’s notorious intelligence agency RAW are known for creating fake terrorists with fake links to Pakistan. Ajmal Kasab & company were not the first in this exercise. RAW and Indian police are practicing this art for years now. In a recent development, a daring Indian lawyer exposed one such drama and proved how the Indian police and RAW officials frame innocent people to prove them to be terrorists from Pakistan.
According to details, criminal lawyer M. S. Khan succeeded in proving the innocence of two Indian men who were alleged to be associates of a Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Tayyiba divisional commander.
Here is the Indian version of the story, with the usual spicy plot details that the Indians prefer in their film plots:
In September 2006, the Delhi Police received information that Pakistan-based divisional commander of the Lashkar-e-Taiba Mohammad Akmal alias Abu Tahir is planning to send his associates to Delhi and other parts of the country.
A team was constituted under late Inspector Mohan Chand Sharma to nab the terrorists, if they managed to enter the national capital. Following a tip-off, the Delhi police mounted a ‘technical surveillance’ and deployed ‘sources’ to track the terrorists. Surveillance reportedly revealed Mohammad Akmal sent one Mustafa along with another person to Delhi to carry out the mission. It further exposed that Mustafa and his associates were operating from their hideout at Mahipalpur.
On December 11, 2006, the police got a tip-off that the two men would come from Dhaula Kuan to Mahipalpur crossing. A Delhi police team was deployed at the spot. At 9.15 pm, the police informer spotted the two accused alighting from a blueline bus (number DL 1PB 0249) plying on route number 729 (Kapashera to Mori Gate).
Fifteen sticks of some yellow explosives, few detonators and Rs 6 lakh in Indian currency were reportedly seized from them. The terrorists were later identified as Gulzar Ahmed Ganai alias Mustafa and Mohammad Ameen Hazzam and were taken to Mumbai from where they allegedly received the explosives. “The charges against them, included planning and attempt to wage war against the country, collection of arms to wage war, possession of explosives, being members of a banned organisation,” MS Khan told an Indian journalist.
This is how he the Indian lawyer tore apart the police and Indian intelligence case in the court:
Prosecution: Secret information established the two accused were Lashkar militants.
Khan: Neither could they establish the nature of the information nor produce any supporting evidence.
Prosecution: The alleged terrorists were arrested on the basis of technical surveillance.
Khan: The cops were never able to establish the nature and scope of their surveillance.
Prosecution: The cops mentioned the ultras had a hideout in Mahipalpur area.
Khan: When asked the location of the hideout, the cops themselves were clueless.
Prosecution: The cops claimed to have arrested the terrorists from a bus around 9.15 pm and produced tickets as evidence.
Khan: When asked the bus conductor told the court that the bus was not even plying at that time and the tickets produced were from the lot used around 11.50 am.
Prosecution: The cops said the militants were there at Dhaula Kuan.
Khan: The police were clueless from where they came to Dhaula Kuan.
Prosecution: It was alleged that the ultras had come to collect hawala money amounting to Rs 6 lakh in cash.
Khan: No evidence was produced to establish who gave them the money and when.
Prosecution: The police said the accused had come to Delhi from outside.
Khan: They could not establish from where they came. Also, no evidence was produced to establish they went to Mumbai to acquire explosives.
Prosecution: The police produced photographs of the crime scene.
Khan: As stated earlier, the photographs were not of Mahipalpur and no cop could be seen in them.
Prosecution: ACP Sanjeev Yadav told the court that one Ganai told the police about the hideout in Mahipalpur on December 14.
Khan: Ganai was taken to Mumbai on December 13 by a Delhi police team. How could he have revealed anything?
0 comments:
Post a Comment